New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
OCPBUGS-32296: Bump K8s api to 1.29.4 #1947
OCPBUGS-32296: Bump K8s api to 1.29.4 #1947
Conversation
…romStorageWithoutResourceVersion feature gate to allow serving watch from storage.
…acher package. It turns out that kube has a custom timeout for tests of 3 minutes. The tests in the cacher package are utilizing nearly the entire time and are being terminated, resulting in failing jobs. Before the change, the TestWatchSemantics took ~43s to run. With this simple change, it now takes ~18s. When we created the tests, we didn't measure the running time and assumed that waiting 1 second on a watch channel to make sure no more events are received was sufficient. This PR decreases the waiting time to 300 milliseconds. Modern computers can perform many tasks within that time. In addition to that, the tests are serial in nature, meaning that there is no other actor that could add items to the database, which could result in receiving new items. After the change the total running time decreased by 17%. Before the tests needed ~176s after they need ~146s. The changes also improved TestWatchSemanticInitialEventsExtended.
…from-etcd-1.29 Cherry-pick of kubernetes#120897 kubernetes#123935 kubernetes#123887 kubernetes#123994: Serve watch without resourceVersion from cache and introduce a WatchFromStorageWithoutResourceVersion feature gate to allow serving watch from storage.
Co-authored-by: Davanum Srinivas <davanum@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Madhav Jivrajani <madhav.jiv@gmail.com>
…2023-45288-129 [CVE-2023-45288][1.29] Bump x/net to v0.23.0
…ck-of-#124124-upstream-release-1.29 Automated cherry pick of kubernetes#124124: fix panic with SIGSEGV in kubeadm certs check-expiration
…-pick-of-#124048-upstream-release-1.29 Automated cherry pick of kubernetes#124048: Use the right feature gate when updating uncertain volumes
…ick-of-#123570-upstream-release-1.29 Automated cherry pick of kubernetes#123570: Filter aggregated apiservice gv
…ick-of-#123873-kubernetes-release-1.29 Automated cherry pick of kubernetes#123873: retry policy creation for CRD type checking E2E test
…ck-of-#123598-upstream-release-1.29 Automated cherry pick of kubernetes#123598: Remotecommand test flake cleanup
…ss iptables / set-cap Signed-off-by: cpanato <ctadeu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: cpanato <ctadeu@gmail.com>
[release-1.29] [go] Bump images, dependencies and versions to go 1.21.9 and distroless iptables and debian-base
…y-pick-of-#121894-origin-release-1.29 Automated cherry pick of kubernetes#121894: build: use -trimpath in non-DBG mode
Signed-off-by: Rita Zhang <rita.z.zhang@gmail.com>
…k-of-#124322-upstream-release-1.29 Automated cherry pick of kubernetes#124322: Add envFrom to serviceaccount admission plugin
@sairameshv: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-32296, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. 3 validation(s) were run on this bug
Requesting review from QA contact: The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
@sairameshv @soltysh can we also link this one to bug https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGS-31716? |
Done !! |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
/approve
/remove-label backports/unvalidated-commits
/label backports/validated-commits
/override ci/prow/unit /retest-required |
@soltysh: Overrode contexts on behalf of soltysh: ci/prow/unit In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: sairameshv, soltysh The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
/test e2e-gcp |
@sairameshv: all tests passed! Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
@sairameshv: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-32296: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-32296 has been moved to the MODIFIED state. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
[ART PR BUILD NOTIFIER] This PR has been included in build openshift-enterprise-pod-container-v4.16.0-202404201710.p0.gd9d4530.assembly.stream.el9 for distgit openshift-enterprise-pod. |
Fix included in accepted release 4.16.0-0.nightly-2024-04-21-123502 |
/assign @soltysh