Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bug 2005242: MaxUnhealthy should not be a string type #919

Conversation

JoelSpeed
Copy link
Contributor

Manual cherry-pick of #909

This field is an int or string and as such should not specify the type to be a string, this can cause errors in the CRD conversion when upgrading as we have changed the underlying type. Removing type: string should resolve these upgrade errors.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the bugzilla/severity-medium Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is medium for the branch this PR is targeting. label Sep 17, 2021
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Sep 17, 2021

@JoelSpeed: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2005242, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

6 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.9.0) matches configured target release for branch (4.9.0)
  • bug is in the state NEW, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)
  • dependent bug Bugzilla bug 1999425 is in the state ON_QA, which is one of the valid states (MODIFIED, ON_QA, VERIFIED)
  • dependent Bugzilla bug 1999425 targets the "4.10.0" release, which is one of the valid target releases: 4.10.0
  • bug has dependents

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @sunzhaohua2

In response to this:

Bug 2005242: MaxUnhealthy should not be a string type

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Sep 17, 2021
Copy link
Contributor

@Fedosin Fedosin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/approve

@JoelSpeed JoelSpeed added the backport-risk-assessed Indicates a PR to a release branch has been evaluated and considered safe to accept. label Oct 14, 2021
Copy link
Contributor

@Fedosin Fedosin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Oct 14, 2021
Copy link
Contributor

@alexander-demicev alexander-demicev left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/approve

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 14, 2021

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: alexander-demichev, Fedosin

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Oct 14, 2021
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

13 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

16 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@JoelSpeed
Copy link
Contributor Author

/skip

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@sdodson
Copy link
Member

sdodson commented Oct 15, 2021

/bugzilla refresh

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 15, 2021

@sdodson: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2005242, which is valid.

6 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.9.z) matches configured target release for branch (4.9.z)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)
  • dependent bug Bugzilla bug 1999425 is in the state VERIFIED, which is one of the valid states (VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE))
  • dependent Bugzilla bug 1999425 targets the "4.10.0" release, which is one of the valid target releases: 4.10.0
  • bug has dependents

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @sunzhaohua2

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@sdodson sdodson added the cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. label Oct 15, 2021
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 15, 2021

@JoelSpeed: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-vsphere 6ff1be7 link /test e2e-vsphere
ci/prow/e2e-libvirt 6ff1be7 link /test e2e-libvirt
ci/prow/e2e-vsphere-upgrade 6ff1be7 link /test e2e-vsphere-upgrade
ci/prow/e2e-aws-disruptive 6ff1be7 link /test e2e-aws-disruptive
ci/prow/e2e-gcp 6ff1be7 link /test e2e-gcp
ci/prow/e2e-azure 6ff1be7 link /test e2e-azure
ci/prow/e2e-gcp-operator 6ff1be7 link /test e2e-gcp-operator
ci/prow/e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6 6ff1be7 link /test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

1 similar comment
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit f85d027 into openshift:release-4.9 Oct 15, 2021
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 15, 2021

@JoelSpeed: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

Bugzilla bug 2005242 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

Bug 2005242: MaxUnhealthy should not be a string type

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@JoelSpeed
Copy link
Contributor Author

/cherry-pick release-4.8

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@JoelSpeed: #919 failed to apply on top of branch "release-4.8":

Applying: Bump controller-tools to allow pattern on IntOrString
Using index info to reconstruct a base tree...
M	go.mod
M	go.sum
M	vendor/golang.org/x/sys/unix/ztypes_linux.go
M	vendor/golang.org/x/sys/windows/types_windows.go
M	vendor/modules.txt
M	vendor/sigs.k8s.io/controller-runtime/go.mod
M	vendor/sigs.k8s.io/controller-runtime/go.sum
M	vendor/sigs.k8s.io/controller-runtime/pkg/cache/internal/informers_map.go
M	vendor/sigs.k8s.io/controller-runtime/pkg/controller/controllerutil/controllerutil.go
A	vendor/sigs.k8s.io/controller-runtime/pkg/internal/flock/flock_unix.go
A	vendor/sigs.k8s.io/controller-runtime/pkg/internal/testing/addr/manager.go
A	vendor/sigs.k8s.io/controller-runtime/pkg/internal/testing/controlplane/etcd.go
M	vendor/sigs.k8s.io/controller-runtime/pkg/webhook/server.go
M	vendor/sigs.k8s.io/controller-tools/pkg/crd/markers/validation.go
M	vendor/sigs.k8s.io/controller-tools/pkg/crd/markers/zz_generated.markerhelp.go
M	vendor/sigs.k8s.io/controller-tools/pkg/crd/schema.go
Falling back to patching base and 3-way merge...
Auto-merging vendor/sigs.k8s.io/controller-tools/pkg/crd/schema.go
Auto-merging vendor/sigs.k8s.io/controller-tools/pkg/crd/markers/zz_generated.markerhelp.go
CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in vendor/sigs.k8s.io/controller-tools/pkg/crd/markers/zz_generated.markerhelp.go
Auto-merging vendor/sigs.k8s.io/controller-tools/pkg/crd/markers/validation.go
CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in vendor/sigs.k8s.io/controller-tools/pkg/crd/markers/validation.go
Auto-merging vendor/sigs.k8s.io/controller-runtime/pkg/webhook/server.go
CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in vendor/sigs.k8s.io/controller-runtime/pkg/webhook/server.go
CONFLICT (modify/delete): vendor/sigs.k8s.io/controller-runtime/pkg/internal/testing/controlplane/etcd.go deleted in HEAD and modified in Bump controller-tools to allow pattern on IntOrString. Version Bump controller-tools to allow pattern on IntOrString of vendor/sigs.k8s.io/controller-runtime/pkg/internal/testing/controlplane/etcd.go left in tree.
CONFLICT (modify/delete): vendor/sigs.k8s.io/controller-runtime/pkg/internal/testing/addr/manager.go deleted in HEAD and modified in Bump controller-tools to allow pattern on IntOrString. Version Bump controller-tools to allow pattern on IntOrString of vendor/sigs.k8s.io/controller-runtime/pkg/internal/testing/addr/manager.go left in tree.
Auto-merging vendor/sigs.k8s.io/controller-runtime/pkg/controller/controllerutil/controllerutil.go
CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in vendor/sigs.k8s.io/controller-runtime/pkg/controller/controllerutil/controllerutil.go
Auto-merging vendor/sigs.k8s.io/controller-runtime/pkg/cache/internal/informers_map.go
Auto-merging vendor/sigs.k8s.io/controller-runtime/go.sum
CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in vendor/sigs.k8s.io/controller-runtime/go.sum
Auto-merging vendor/sigs.k8s.io/controller-runtime/go.mod
CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in vendor/sigs.k8s.io/controller-runtime/go.mod
Auto-merging vendor/modules.txt
CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in vendor/modules.txt
Auto-merging vendor/k8s.io/code-generator/cmd/go-to-protobuf/protobuf/tags.go
CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in vendor/k8s.io/code-generator/cmd/go-to-protobuf/protobuf/tags.go
Auto-merging vendor/golang.org/x/sys/windows/types_windows.go
Auto-merging vendor/golang.org/x/sys/unix/ztypes_linux.go
Auto-merging go.sum
CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in go.sum
Auto-merging go.mod
CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in go.mod
error: Failed to merge in the changes.
hint: Use 'git am --show-current-patch=diff' to see the failed patch
Patch failed at 0001 Bump controller-tools to allow pattern on IntOrString
When you have resolved this problem, run "git am --continue".
If you prefer to skip this patch, run "git am --skip" instead.
To restore the original branch and stop patching, run "git am --abort".

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-4.8

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. backport-risk-assessed Indicates a PR to a release branch has been evaluated and considered safe to accept. bugzilla/severity-medium Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is medium for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

7 participants