New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
WRKLDS-700: bump(k8s) to v1.27.2 #1420
WRKLDS-700: bump(k8s) to v1.27.2 #1420
Conversation
@atiratree: This pull request references WRKLDS-700 which is a valid jira issue. In response to this: Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I have tested the shadowing feature manually, but I need to check the unit tests as well and check that they are run properly.
@@ -107,9 +107,12 @@ func NewDefaultOcCommand(in io.Reader, out, errout io.Writer) *cobra.Command { | |||
cmdPathPieces := os.Args[1:] | |||
pluginHandler := kubecmd.NewDefaultPluginHandler(plugin.ValidPluginFilenamePrefixes) | |||
|
|||
// TODO: this should be imported from kubectl |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@ardaguclu we need to expose this in kubectl so we can consume it here.
Can you please review this shadowing commit carefully to make sure I have not missed anything?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
we need to expose this in kubectl so we can consume it here.
ah, I missed that. I'll open a PR to fix that in next bump.
Can you please review this shadowing commit carefully to make sure I have not missed anything?
I compared the changes on upstream and there seems to be nothing missed. Thanks.
/hold |
There is still not a parity between the oc and kubectl command. The main things I am seeing that need to be ported and tested:
#1424 is introducing plugin tests which are based on the upstream ones |
/retest-required |
/test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
/approve
Fix for |
Fix for some of |
here is an alternative to fix some of the for the rest of the |
/retest |
2 similar comments
/retest |
/retest |
|
/retest-required |
/retest |
/retest |
/lgtm |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: ardaguclu, atiratree, soltysh The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
/hold cancel |
@atiratree: The following test failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
2fd1127
into
openshift:master
No description provided.