Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

WRKLDS-700: bump(k8s) to v1.27.2 #1420

Merged
merged 5 commits into from Jul 4, 2023

Conversation

atiratree
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@atiratree atiratree changed the title bump(k8s) to v0.27.1 WRKLDS-700: bump(k8s) to v0.27.1 May 9, 2023
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label May 9, 2023
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented May 9, 2023

@atiratree: This pull request references WRKLDS-700 which is a valid jira issue.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from mfojtik and soltysh May 9, 2023 19:01
Copy link
Member Author

@atiratree atiratree left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I have tested the shadowing feature manually, but I need to check the unit tests as well and check that they are run properly.

@@ -107,9 +107,12 @@ func NewDefaultOcCommand(in io.Reader, out, errout io.Writer) *cobra.Command {
cmdPathPieces := os.Args[1:]
pluginHandler := kubecmd.NewDefaultPluginHandler(plugin.ValidPluginFilenamePrefixes)

// TODO: this should be imported from kubectl
Copy link
Member Author

@atiratree atiratree May 9, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@ardaguclu we need to expose this in kubectl so we can consume it here.

Can you please review this shadowing commit carefully to make sure I have not missed anything?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

we need to expose this in kubectl so we can consume it here.

ah, I missed that. I'll open a PR to fix that in next bump.

Can you please review this shadowing commit carefully to make sure I have not missed anything?

I compared the changes on upstream and there seems to be nothing missed. Thanks.

@atiratree
Copy link
Member Author

/hold

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label May 9, 2023
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label May 10, 2023
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label May 11, 2023
@atiratree
Copy link
Member Author

There is still not a parity between the oc and kubectl command. The main things I am seeing that need to be ported and tested:

  • profiling
  • plugin completion
  • normalization function and logging

#1424 is introducing plugin tests which are based on the upstream ones

@atiratree
Copy link
Member Author

/retest-required

@ardaguclu
Copy link
Member

/test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6

Copy link
Member

@soltysh soltysh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm
/approve

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. labels May 22, 2023
@ardaguclu
Copy link
Member

Fix for oc annotate test failure openshift/origin#27932

@ardaguclu
Copy link
Member

Fix for some of oc explain tests openshift/origin#27936

@atiratree
Copy link
Member Author

here is an alternative to fix some of the oc explain failures: openshift/origin#27937

for the rest of the oc explain failure we have to wait for openshift-apiserver rebase to see that all of our resources will be discoverable in openapi v3 schema

@atiratree
Copy link
Member Author

/retest

2 similar comments
@ardaguclu
Copy link
Member

/retest

@flavianmissi
Copy link
Member

/retest

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Jun 16, 2023
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Jun 19, 2023
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 19, 2023
@atiratree
Copy link
Member Author

@atiratree atiratree changed the title WRKLDS-700: bump(k8s) to v0.27.1 WRKLDS-700: bump(k8s) to v0.27.2 Jun 19, 2023
@atiratree
Copy link
Member Author

/retest-required

@ardaguclu
Copy link
Member

/retest

@atiratree atiratree changed the title WRKLDS-700: bump(k8s) to v0.27.2 WRKLDS-700: bump(k8s) to v1.27.2 Jun 29, 2023
@ardaguclu
Copy link
Member

/retest

@ardaguclu
Copy link
Member

/lgtm
/hold
until explain tests in origin is disabled temporarily

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jul 3, 2023
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jul 3, 2023

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: ardaguclu, atiratree, soltysh

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@ardaguclu
Copy link
Member

/hold cancel
/retest

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jul 4, 2023
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jul 4, 2023

@atiratree: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6 26507f3 link false /test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 2fd1127 into openshift:master Jul 4, 2023
11 of 12 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants