New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add BZ component name to OWNERS #367
Conversation
/retest |
/lgtm |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: sallyom, soltysh The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
1 similar comment
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
These to subcommands interact with the cluster-version operator, which is now maintained by the updates team. I'm seeding the alias with the content from [1]. I've left the 'component' property (added to the root OWNERS in e83f2ac, Add BZ component name to OWNERS, 2020-04-03, openshift#367) off for now, because the tooling around that only consumes entries at the repo level. [1]: https://github.com/openshift/cluster-version-operator/blob/914467c03b5bc25dbe4c9295c420fdb2598db821/OWNERS
This subcommand interacts with the cluster-version operator, which is now maintained by the updates team. I'm seeding the alias with the content from [1]. I've left the 'component' property (added to the root OWNERS in e83f2ac, Add BZ component name to OWNERS, 2020-04-03, openshift#367) off for now, because the tooling around that only consumes entries at the repo level. I think that the admin/release should also be maintained by the updates team, because it manages the release images for which the CVO is the sole consumer. But Scott wants to punt on that for now. [1]: https://github.com/openshift/cluster-version-operator/blob/914467c03b5bc25dbe4c9295c420fdb2598db821/OWNERS
This subcommand interacts with the cluster-version operator, which is now maintained by the updates team. I'm seeding the alias with the content from [1]. I've left the 'component' property (added to the root OWNERS in e83f2ac, Add BZ component name to OWNERS, 2020-04-03, openshift#367) off for now, because the tooling around that only consumes entries at the repo level. I think that the admin/release should also be maintained by the updates team, because it manages the release images for which the CVO is the sole consumer. But Scott wants to punt on that for now. [1]: https://github.com/openshift/cluster-version-operator/blob/914467c03b5bc25dbe4c9295c420fdb2598db821/OWNERS
This subcommand interacts with the cluster-version operator, which is now maintained by the updates team. I'm seeding the alias with the content from [1] (and adding Lala, who's the team lead). I've left the 'component' property (added to the root OWNERS in e83f2ac, Add BZ component name to OWNERS, 2020-04-03, openshift#367) off for now, because the tooling around that only consumes entries at the repo level. I think that the admin/release should also be maintained by the updates team, because it manages the release images for which the CVO is the sole consumer. But Scott wants to punt on that for now. [1]: https://github.com/openshift/cluster-version-operator/blob/914467c03b5bc25dbe4c9295c420fdb2598db821/OWNERS
No description provided.