Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[enterprise-4.6] Issue in file networking/routes/route-configuration.adoc #39935

Closed
saumeya opened this issue Dec 16, 2021 · 5 comments
Closed
Assignees
Labels
lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed.

Comments

@saumeya
Copy link

saumeya commented Dec 16, 2021

Which section(s) is the issue in?

Openshift docs -> under Networking -> under Configuring routes (https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/4.8/networking/routes/route-configuration.html#nw-ingress-creating-a-route-via-an-ingress_route-configuration)

The Ingress Yaml that is written contains fields like serviceName and servicePort which are no longer supported and result in error

What needs fixing?

Update the Yaml definition (there are 2 Yamls in the same section where this needs to be updated) to

backend:        
  service:
    name: frontend
    port:
      number: 443
@skrthomas
Copy link
Contributor

skrthomas commented Feb 28, 2022

@saumeya Hi, thanks for filing a docs issue! Can you point me to where you're seeing serviceName and servicePort are no longer supported? We just had a docs PR merged for this same yaml definition to change to serviceName and servicePort: https://github.com/openshift/openshift-docs/pull/41325/files, so I think the yaml should be corrected now in the link you pasted above.

@skrthomas skrthomas self-assigned this Mar 3, 2022
@openshift-bot
Copy link

Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.

Mark the issue as fresh by commenting /remove-lifecycle stale.
Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.
Exclude this issue from closing by commenting /lifecycle frozen.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

/lifecycle stale

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Jun 2, 2022
@openshift-bot
Copy link

Stale issues rot after 30d of inactivity.

Mark the issue as fresh by commenting /remove-lifecycle rotten.
Rotten issues close after an additional 30d of inactivity.
Exclude this issue from closing by commenting /lifecycle frozen.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

/lifecycle rotten
/remove-lifecycle stale

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. and removed lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. labels Jul 2, 2022
@openshift-bot
Copy link

Rotten issues close after 30d of inactivity.

Reopen the issue by commenting /reopen.
Mark the issue as fresh by commenting /remove-lifecycle rotten.
Exclude this issue from closing again by commenting /lifecycle frozen.

/close

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot closed this as completed Aug 1, 2022
@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 1, 2022

@openshift-bot: Closing this issue.

In response to this:

Rotten issues close after 30d of inactivity.

Reopen the issue by commenting /reopen.
Mark the issue as fresh by commenting /remove-lifecycle rotten.
Exclude this issue from closing again by commenting /lifecycle frozen.

/close

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants