-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 50
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Simplify installation for alpha0.5 #35
Comments
Looks like ZODB may be an out of the box easy-to-install solution as it already has an RDFLib backend. Then again it seems to have some incompatibilities that may be problematic. |
We don't need to worry about the binary dependencies if we rely on a simple On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 6:22 PM, Stephen Larson notifications@github.com
Cheers, |
@mwatts15 any update on this one? |
Unit tests pass with rdflib-zodb. It seems to need additional configuration to store the DB in a file. |
is that checked in somewhere now? not seeing any references to zodb in the On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 8:09 AM, mwatts15 notifications@github.com wrote:
|
No, I tested it locally. |
ok-- since we're operating on limited time, if you want to commit to your On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 8:14 AM, mwatts15 notifications@github.com wrote:
|
If you want to have a look, I pushed a branch zodb. |
As reported on the openworm-discuss list folks are running into roadblocks installing this library due to a dependency on the BerkeleyDB being installed on their system and version mismatches. This is too high a bar for most users to have to worry about; they won't use this and they'll go elsewhere. We need to simplify the installation procedures so that pip install is really all that is needed.
One approach may be to look at adding a new RDFLib backend that is pure python. Some options include:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: