Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

DNS query to FW not working with Gateway Group #745

Closed
gregober opened this issue Feb 4, 2016 · 3 comments
Closed

DNS query to FW not working with Gateway Group #745

gregober opened this issue Feb 4, 2016 · 3 comments
Assignees
Labels
feature Adding new functionality

Comments

@gregober
Copy link

gregober commented Feb 4, 2016

Apply to both Unbound or DNS forwarder

  1. You create a simple dual WAN config.
  2. You bind that to a FW rule in order to apply the Multi-Wan settings to your LAN traffic
  3. All DNS traffic is blocked no querry will go through

A simple solution is to create an allow rule for traffic from your LAN to your FW on port 53 and place It before your Dual Wan GW binding… but this is just a workaround.

DNS traffic rules should be auto-created based on which interfaces you have defined on your DNS (unbound or DNS forwarder).

@fichtner fichtner added this to the Future milestone Feb 16, 2016
@fichtner fichtner added the feature Adding new functionality label Feb 16, 2016
@fichtner
Copy link
Member

We're not sure about the most sensible course of action and will investigate further before applying a fix :)

@fichtner
Copy link
Member

why does github hab this close and comment button? sorry

@fichtner fichtner reopened this Feb 16, 2016
@fichtner fichtner changed the title DNS querry to FW not working with Gateway Group DNS query to FW not working with Gateway Group Feb 16, 2016
@AdSchellevis
Copy link
Member

@gregober we've tested the same at our office and confirmed you need a firewall rule to allow access to the local machine, otherwise it will be send to the gateway.

We will make sure to add this to our upcoming documentation, but auto generating rules is in our opinion not the best solution. In some cases you don't want the local services to be accessible via all connected clients, other services also don't inject rules for themselves.
The current situation without the gateway group is by the way also not generated in the firewall, but default available using the "allow all" rule.

Auto generating would make the world more complex and will hide the real situation for the administrator.

@fichtner fichtner removed this from the Future milestone Jul 23, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
feature Adding new functionality
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants