-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix part of #8015: editable.question.backend.api.service.ts now returns a domain object … #8986
Fix part of #8015: editable.question.backend.api.service.ts now returns a domain object … #8986
Conversation
…and all frontend tests pass
Hi, @robatras. This pull request does not have a "CHANGELOG: ..." label as mentioned in the PR checkbox list. Please add this label. PRs without this label will not be merged. If you are unsure of which label to add, please ask the reviewers for guidance. Thanks! |
@seanlip @DubeySandeep PTAL! @yudani-s and I worked on this together |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code looks okay, have you verified it by running a local server as well?
@robatras Please edit your PR title so that it fits what point 1 in the essential checklist is asking. Also, did you bypass the push verification checks? |
Assigning @ankita240796 for the first-pass review of this pull request. Thanks! |
Just edited it! Currently working on fixing the frontend issue test. And, i followed the instructions for pushing it; however, somehow, it did bypass the checks. @kevinlee12 |
Did you run |
Hi, I worked with @robatras on this task. Yes, we did run python -m scripts.start, and the development server seemed to have the same functionality from what we could tell. |
What was the result after you run the frontend tests locally? The command is |
@kevinlee12 When we run the frontend command locally, all tests pass and we receive this: |
Can you try to merge from upstream/develop and push again? |
…-editable-question-backend-api
@kevinlee12 Just pushed it again and looks like all tests are passing like before, but the karma coverage error at the bottom still exists. |
Ah, sorry, I missed the coverage error the first time. The prepush checks doesn't check for coverage, so in this case, you need to write more tests to ensure that there's 100% coverage. If you need assistance, let me know and I'll redirect you to the right person to assist. |
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop #8986 +/- ##
========================================
Coverage 53.41% 53.42%
========================================
Files 870 870
Lines 35764 35766 +2
Branches 4250 4250
========================================
+ Hits 19103 19105 +2
Misses 15728 15728
Partials 933 933
|
Overview
modified the tests spec to expect domain object.
Essential Checklist
PR Pointers