You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
A discussion has started about this topic (see #961).
In this discussion, two options are proposed. In the first option, we might solve the problem of the loop by making as parameter the number of relations kept between a building and the RSU (an endless number would be suitable in the case of RSU being buffer circles around meteorological stations).
In the second option, we could add a new parameter to the workflow to specify that the LCZ should be calculated using the exact method for indicator calculation. However, it will work only when the possibility of using its own data in GeoClimate will be coded (since RSU will then be provided by the user...).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
A discussion has started about this topic (see #961).
In this discussion, two options are proposed. In the first option, we might solve the problem of the loop by making as parameter the number of relations kept between a building and the RSU (an endless number would be suitable in the case of RSU being buffer circles around meteorological stations).
In the second option, we could add a new parameter to the workflow to specify that the LCZ should be calculated using the exact method for indicator calculation. However, it will work only when the possibility of using its own data in GeoClimate will be coded (since RSU will then be provided by the user...).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: