You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Having ord publishing a consensus / root hash that would include:
consensus hash of previous block
for each blessed inscription reveal: inscription number + inscription inscription id + content hash
for each blessed inscription transfer: inscription id + new outpoint + new offset
Introducing this kind of consensus hash would be very helpful for many actors in this ecosystem.
It would also help everyone understand that if it's not part of consensus (say, cursed inscriptions, or even better, inscription number), it is subject to change.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I can see this being helpful, we could publish the current block's hash on the /status page. We would just have to agree on the serialization and order of hashing.
Having ord publishing a consensus / root hash that would include:
Introducing this kind of consensus hash would be very helpful for many actors in this ecosystem.
It would also help everyone understand that if it's not part of consensus (say, cursed inscriptions, or even better, inscription number), it is subject to change.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: