Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Reconsider descending numbering #43

Closed
casey opened this issue Jan 14, 2022 · 1 comment · Fixed by #45
Closed

Reconsider descending numbering #43

casey opened this issue Jan 14, 2022 · 1 comment · Fixed by #45

Comments

@casey
Copy link
Collaborator

casey commented Jan 14, 2022

I'm thinking that descending numbering is possibly a mistake. It's intended to fix the problem that satoshis with short, desirable names were mined in early blocks, which presumably won't ever move. We could fix this by defining the naming scheme to go from long to short, instead of reversing the numbering of all satoshis. I think this would be better, since ascending numbers feel more natural and are easier to explain. Using ascending numbers would mean that desirable numbers, like single-digit satoshis, were mined in the genesis block, which is still unfortunate. However, it might be worth the additional simplicity. After all, what's short doesn't really matter, what matters is what's rare, and short, low numbers will still be rare, they'll just be longer than otherwise. Additionally, it'll be exciting to see if early blocks suddenly move, which would lower the floor on the length of sat numbers.

@casey
Copy link
Collaborator Author

casey commented Jan 14, 2022

Comments welcome!

@casey casey linked a pull request Jan 17, 2022 that will close this issue
@casey casey closed this as completed in #45 Jan 17, 2022
yann-sjtu referenced this issue in okx/ord Dec 18, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant