New Features that Musescore 4 NEED!!! #12677
Replies: 3 comments
-
Emm, the 6th picture don´t see please... this image should not go there |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
About point 2: I could relatively easily recreate these examples in MuseScore 3. Use the following features:
(I see no "grace rests" in your examples though; those are just normal rests a different voice, with the beaming option and the small option enabled.) Things like slurs and beams have been massively improved in MuseScore 4, so most probably this will look much better in 4. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
(Yes, but please nobody look at it in MU4 until we fix the beams starting on rests) 😇 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Hi, I was wondering if the following functionalities can be done in musescore 3: or if they can be added for musescore 4:
I don't know the exact name of the functionality in question so I'll give a little explanation of what it is and I'll add some images.
Play rehearsal marks (ie: be able to play the part that is enclosed by marks A and B, and thus save space in certain parts of the song where it repeats)
Score Link: http://soymusicaecuador.blogspot.com/2010/04/nos-piden-el-pasillo-sendas-distintas.html
Grace note chords, grace note rests, etc.
Score link: http://www.teddyleongshe.com/Hijo%20de%20la%20luna.pdf
I took a look at the last nocturne update on 08/03/2022, and there are a few things that I dislike a bit: The blue playhead that moves when you touch a score, in musescore 3 it was a thicker bar that wrapped around the entire the note and for my taste was easier to understand, but now in musescore 4 that bar in fine and thin,
and the notes are not painted in the color of the layer... (it would be good if they added the option of having those two bars in preferences, because some people will like one more and others will prefer the other)
Thank you for understanding
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions