Should a label be created for index-generating markup?

[electric-coder]

Does the community think it might be necessary to create a label in the repository for the index-generating markup?

For example, if we search for the keyword index the current results return 347 open issues and 1,399 closed issues. But most of these are textual coincidences - here's one case where the default index.rst was included in conf.py but nothing in the post is about index-generating markup itself.

It's been my experience that cases like these make searching the repository tedious. Historically the repository hasn't kept labels for specific reST directives but perhaps there might be a substantial gain in time not spent searching, for maintainers and users alike, at the costing of creating more labels.

[AA-Turner]

Seems reasonable, do you have a list of issues / PRs you'd include in the label?

A

[electric-coder]

Seems reasonable, do you have a list of issues / PRs you'd include in the label?

Give me a few days and I'll start going through the repository to compile a list (aiming at sparing maintainers that research time). I'll add it to this thread as an answer.