You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Executing code that cannot be run on WebAssembly, either because it can't be compiled or using a compiled interpreter is not feasible or too restrictive, will be a powerful feature. This capability will also be beneficial for testing code generated by LLMs. The idea is to execute such code within a container.
Requirements
We need the following primitives:
Container Management:
Spin up and shut down a container.
Optionally, implement a way to make containers persistent or "sticky" for repeated use.
Code Handling:
Load code into the container.
Execution:
Execute the loaded code.
Output Retrieval:
Retrieve the output from the executed code.
Container Engine Selection
Use Firecracker if the system is running on Linux.
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
Executing code that cannot be run on WebAssembly, either because it can't be compiled or using a compiled interpreter is not feasible or too restrictive, will be a powerful feature. This capability will also be beneficial for testing code generated by LLMs. The idea is to execute such code within a container.
Requirements
We need the following primitives:
Container Management:
Code Handling:
Execution:
Output Retrieval:
Container Engine Selection
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions