New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add perlcritic freenode #7231
Add perlcritic freenode #7231
Conversation
398c71c
to
30e7b07
Compare
01ebd22
to
84a850d
Compare
c02e2b8
to
6ed93a9
Compare
d683db9
to
7d527de
Compare
d1a1870
to
d7cb1b8
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM but I think someone else should have a look before we merge this.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good - although it was @kraih who did similar changes for os-autoinst and openQA.
I'm only wondering whether having 76 open PRs makes this a good time to merge. On the other hand that number isn't likely to decrease soon.
Ahm right, I got confused with who authored previous work. I have been rebasing this work for some days, but yes, it should not change that number too much. Feel free to merge it in the best moment any of you can find. Thanks. |
Then rebase your changes and we will merge. |
d7cb1b8
to
8c79d30
Compare
b166793
to
0ad7c80
Compare
0ad7c80
to
bd0a3b1
Compare
Changes rebased. |
Use
Perl::Critic::Freenode
perlcritic rules as in os-autoinst and openQA.