馃尡 Only call GitHub APIs when needed #918
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Integration tests success for a732a2a48d18236e322c4a850e2838960225f13e |
azeemshaikh38
force-pushed
the
azeems/once
branch
from
a732a2a
to
eca0557
Compare
|
Integration tests success for eca0557d1094b190ef35199d7040fa854e29fdcc |
oliverchang
approved these changes
Aug 26, 2021
|
Integration tests success for 1f9fb968a89b930ed552aaa2862d6e535487c832 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What kind of change does this PR introduce? (Bug fix, feature, docs update, ...)
Only call GitHub APIs when needed by checks. Note that, this PR does not do it for tarball download and extract since some more thought/testing maybe needed for that. Might consider doing the same for tarballHandler in the future.
Does this PR introduce a breaking change? (What changes might users need to make in their application due to this PR?)
No.