Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: remove app setting password protection #2954

Closed
wants to merge 4 commits into from

Conversation

KeeJef
Copy link
Collaborator

@KeeJef KeeJef commented Oct 9, 2023

This a proxy pull request from the following codeberg branch https://codeberg.org/gravel/session-desktop/commits/branch/no-protect-settings

Most app settings are less sensitive
than the content of one's messages,
and therefore do not require password protection.

This commit removes password protection from
the settings view. This also dampens the UX impact
of the misleading 'Message Requests' entry among
settings categories, as the settings view
is closed and locked upon navigation to the entry.

Sensitive app settings are addressed in later commits.

Relates: #1768

gravel added 4 commits October 9, 2023 19:38
Most app settings are less sensitive
than the content of one's messages,
and therefore do not require password protection.

This commit removes password protection from
the settings view. This also dampens the UX impact
of the misleading 'Message Requests' entry among
settings categories, as the settings view
is closed and locked upon navigation to the entry.

Sensitive app settings are addressed in later commits.

Relates: oxen-io#1768
As we may want to password-protect other settings categories,
it is crucial to seperate the password protection modal
from the seed phrase modal, where it was previously bound.
@Bilb Bilb changed the base branch from clearnet to unstable March 21, 2024 05:41
@Bilb Bilb closed this Mar 26, 2024
@Bilb
Copy link
Collaborator

Bilb commented Mar 26, 2024

closed in favor of #3059

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants