Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Glob support for coverage locations #234

Closed
hitmands opened this issue Sep 25, 2020 · 3 comments · Fixed by #240
Closed

Glob support for coverage locations #234

hitmands opened this issue Sep 25, 2020 · 3 comments · Fixed by #240
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request help wanted Extra attention is needed

Comments

@hitmands
Copy link

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
It would be great to use glob to describe coverage locations

Describe the solution you'd like

      - name: Jest Testing
        uses: paambaati/codeclimate-action@v2.6.0
        env:
          CC_TEST_REPORTER_ID: ${{ secrets.CODE_CLIMATE_TOKEN }}
        with:
          coverageCommand: yarn test
          coverageLocations: |
            ${{github.workspace}}/packages/*/reports/jest-coverage/lcov.info:lcov

Describe alternatives you've considered
Listing every package manually

@hitmands hitmands added the enhancement New feature or request label Sep 25, 2020
@paambaati paambaati added the help wanted Extra attention is needed label Oct 1, 2020
@Sumolari
Copy link
Contributor

Sumolari commented Oct 1, 2020

Is this something you are working on actively?

I'm interested in this feature and might implement it myself if nobody is currently working on it.

@paambaati
Copy link
Owner

This could be a neat value-add. @Sumolari Thanks, PRs are welcome.

@paambaati
Copy link
Owner

@hitmands Many thanks to @Sumolari, this is now available in v2.7.4 🎉

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request help wanted Extra attention is needed
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants