-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 116
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
About technology statistics on the web #90
Comments
PS: a nice article about JavaScript |
derhuerst: well, I don't know why you reacted negatively to my article since I just report the state of what it is today.... |
This example is bad : |
I'm nowadays a fullstack JavaScript developer (former Flash Developer), so please – there's nothing nice about that article.. |
I would like to point out of how google & co. force people to use their technology "standard", like chrome, webrtc and so on. The whole developer community just don't realize how google controls the internet standards and how they proceed to force developers and users to use what they wish.
Statistics are one of the first propaganda tool, fake or real, no one can check if what it shows on your screen is indeed true or false. But as evil is in the details, you will clearly see (if you make a little research by yourself) that what it's published is often not really true, but just a manner to project their wish to people mind.
Example, the repository open-source-flash of pakastin got more than 6777 stars and 132 watches in less than 2 months, webrtc (https://github.com/webrtc/webrtc-org) has painfully 41 watchers and 60 stars since years.
This show clearly that the protagonists are desperately trying to bring the whole worldwide web developer community to their side, and for sure it's easily understandable since a "standard", whatever it is, has no power but with a good amount of developers.
In conclusion, the best way to try to understand what's happening with all these technologies, standards and languages on the web we constantly need to ask questions and proof about all articles published, starting from its source.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: