API Basics should introduce FileSystemLoader instead of PackageLoader #91

rubic opened this Issue Jan 21, 2012 · 0 comments


None yet

1 participant

rubic commented Jan 21, 2012

Every time I visit this page, I'm momentarily confused, then realize it's introducing the PackageLoader instead of FileSystemLoader:


Not only is PackageLoader more difficult to intuit on first reading, but FileSystemLoader is mentioned in the Loaders API as the preferred way to load templates from the file system.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment