Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Nov 15, 2023. It is now read-only.

BABE: Fix aux data cleaning (#11263) #11276

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 25, 2022
Merged

Conversation

chevdor
Copy link
Contributor

@chevdor chevdor commented Apr 25, 2022

Backport of #11263 into the release branch polkadot-v0.9.20

With the latest optimizations of the FinalityNotification generation, the aux data pruning started
to print a warning. The problem here was that we printed a warning and stopped the adding of blocks
to prune when we hit the heigh_limit. This is now wrong, as we could for example have two 512 long
forks and then we start finalizing one of them. The second fork head would be part of the stale
heads at some point (in the current implementation when we finalize second fork head number + 1),
but then we would actually need to go back into the past than heigh_limit (which was actually
last_finalized - 1). We now go back until we reach the canonical chain.

Also fixed some wrong comment that was added by be about the content of the finalized blocks in
the FinalityNotification.

With the latest optimizations of the `FinalityNotification` generation, the aux data pruning started
to print a warning. The problem here was that we printed a warning and stopped the adding of blocks
to prune when we hit the `heigh_limit`. This is now wrong, as we could for example have two 512 long
forks and then we start finalizing one of them. The second fork head would be part of the stale
heads at some point (in the current implementation when we finalize second fork head number + 1),
but then we would actually need to go back into the past than `heigh_limit` (which was actually
last_finalized - 1). We now go back until we reach the canonical chain.

Also fixed some wrong comment that was added by be about the content of the `finalized` blocks in
the `FinalityNotification`.
@chevdor chevdor added A0-please_review Pull request needs code review. B0-silent Changes should not be mentioned in any release notes C1-low PR touches the given topic and has a low impact on builders. labels Apr 25, 2022
@chevdor chevdor requested review from bkchr and coderobe April 25, 2022 08:29
Copy link
Member

@bkchr bkchr left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

TY!

@chevdor chevdor requested a review from dvdplm April 25, 2022 08:36
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
A0-please_review Pull request needs code review. B0-silent Changes should not be mentioned in any release notes C1-low PR touches the given topic and has a low impact on builders.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants