Society Pallet to FrameV2 #9472
Conversation
|
someone fixed that :). |
KiChjang
added
A0-please_review
| impl<T: Config<I>, I: 'static> GenesisBuild<T, I> for GenesisConfig<T, I> { | ||
| fn build(&self) { | ||
| Pot::<T, I>::put(self.pot); | ||
| MaxMembers::<T, I>::put(self.max_members); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Should we add a warning if self.max_members >= self.members.len()? cc @thiolliere
There was a problem hiding this comment.
yes and we should even panic during genesis, this will happen when we implement the bounding of storages.
But as it wasn't done before I think we shouldn't block on this.
| @@ -552,8 +713,8 @@ decl_module! { | |||
| /// | |||
| /// Total Complexity: O(M + B + C + logM + logB + X) | |||
| /// # </weight> | |||
| #[weight = T::BlockWeights::get().max_block / 10] | |||
| pub fn bid(origin, value: BalanceOf<T, I>) -> DispatchResult { | |||
| #[pallet::weight(T::BlockWeights::get().max_block / 10)] | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Out of scope of this PR, but these weight seems strange - anyone know if this pallet be properly benchmarked?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
yes it should be done, but the weight is probably an upper bound for now, at least for our usage in kusama I guess, so maybe not the priority
|
bot merge |
|
Trying merge. |
ghost
merged commit 
relates: #7882
Following the upgrade guidelines here: https://crates.parity.io/frame_support/attr.pallet.html#upgrade-guidelines.
From https://crates.parity.io/frame_support/attr.pallet.html#checking-upgrade-guidelines
So users of the
Societypallet must be careful about the name they used inconstruct_runtime!. Hence the runtime-migration label, which might not be needed depending on the configuration of theSocietypallet.only kusama uses the pallet
Societykusama uses the name
Societyinconstruct-runtime!so no need for migration