Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Only return an error if the extrinsic failed. #156

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Sep 1, 2020
Merged

Only return an error if the extrinsic failed. #156

merged 1 commit into from Sep 1, 2020

Conversation

dvc94ch
Copy link
Contributor

@dvc94ch dvc94ch commented Aug 30, 2020

If an extrinsic in a block fails, all extrinsics will report a failure. We check the phase when watching an extrinsic and ignore errors of other extriniscs.

@dvc94ch
Copy link
Contributor Author

dvc94ch commented Aug 31, 2020

All tests pass, it's a transient error. Not sure why we keep getting virual method called after the test runner completes.

ascjones
ascjones approved these changes Sep 1, 2020
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@ascjones ascjones left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@ascjones
Copy link
Member

ascjones commented Sep 1, 2020

All tests pass, it's a transient error. Not sure why we keep getting virual method called after the test runner completes.

Yeah that keeps happening, perhaps something to do with the test client?

@ascjones ascjones merged commit e9c50e2 into paritytech:master Sep 1, 2020
@ascjones ascjones mentioned this pull request Sep 1, 2020
Merged
dvdplm added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 15, 2020
@dvdplm
Merge branch 'master' into staking
773d43e 
* master:
  decode option event arg (#158)
  Release v0.12.0 (#157)
  Only return an error if the extrinsic failed. (#156)
  Update to rc6. (#155)
  Different assert. (#153)
  Add a method to fetch an unhashed key, close #100 (#152)
  Fix port number. (#151)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@ascjones ascjones ascjones approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
2 participants
@dvc94ch @ascjones