Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Hydrogens pro-S and pro-R #63

Open
patrickfuchs opened this issue Jan 20, 2021 · 2 comments
Open

Hydrogens pro-S and pro-R #63

patrickfuchs opened this issue Jan 20, 2021 · 2 comments
Assignees

Comments

@patrickfuchs
Copy link
Owner

patrickfuchs commented Jan 20, 2021

In an NMR lipids post, we talked some time ago about being consistent regarding which hydrogens are pro-R and which are pro-S. So far if we buildH on, say C31, we build H311 and H312. So we add 1 and 2 suffixes. The idea would be for example to assign 1 to the pro-R hydrogen, and 2 to the pro-S.
This is something we can do without too much pain in buildH. I describe the strategy in a recent issue of NMRlipids IVb.
In fact, I did a check for Berger POPC. What matters is the order of the helpers in the .json files. So the "only thing" we have to do, if we want this, is to do a check when we create the json file.
So we can think about whether we implement this or not.

@patrickfuchs
Copy link
Owner Author

Samuli Ollila created a new issue on the Databank project of NMRlipids. We'll discuss there how to be consistent with the input files between both projects.

@patrickfuchs
Copy link
Owner Author

For info, maybe the NMRlipids will stop using .def files and using mapping names instead. We plan to discuss this soon with them.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants