Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Lucene 3.1 compatible luke version out of the box #35

Closed
GoogleCodeExporter opened this issue Jul 8, 2015 · 15 comments
Closed

Lucene 3.1 compatible luke version out of the box #35

GoogleCodeExporter opened this issue Jul 8, 2015 · 15 comments

Comments

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link

Lucene 3.1 got released a couple of days ago. It would be great to have Luke 
compatible with the same. 

What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. Create an index using Lucene 3.1 . 
2. Open it with Luke. 


What is the expected output? What do you see instead?

TermEnum-s and list are expected to be seen. 
Instead, we get an error - 
"Unknown Format:  -11"


What version of the product are you using? On what operating system?

Luke 1.0.1 on Ubuntu 10.04 64-bit . 


Please provide any additional information below.


Original issue reported on code.google.com by oss.akk on 3 Apr 2011 at 7:01

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

Create a new branch
* branch-1.1 

diff file attached that contains the changes that needs to be made to compile 
the code.

Original comment by oss.akk on 3 Apr 2011 at 7:19

Attachments:

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

All lucene-3.0.1-* files removed from the lib directory and the following files 
present in the lib directory. 

lucene-analyzers-3.1.0.jar 
lucene-core-3.1.0.jar 
lucene-misc-3.1.0.jar  
lucene-queries-3.1.0.jar  
lucene-xml-query-parser-3.1.0.jar

Original comment by oss.akk on 3 Apr 2011 at 7:21

Attachments:

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

It would be nice to have a 1.1.0 release soon for the lucene 3.1.0 based 
indices. Thanks ! 

Original comment by oss.akk on 3 Apr 2011 at 7:22

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

While able to successfully view the index,  the luke GUI tool says: 

Index Format: -11 (Lucene 1.3 or prior). 

for an index created using Lucene 3.1 . Need to be revisited. 

Original comment by oss.akk on 3 Apr 2011 at 7:57

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

Revised patch to fix the above problem related to Luke GUI tool and some other 
documentation fixes:


Original comment by oss.akk on 3 Apr 2011 at 9:52

Attachments:

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

Original comment by oss.akk on 3 Apr 2011 at 9:53

Attachments:

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

Original comment by oss.akk on 3 Apr 2011 at 9:57

Attachments:

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

Same version name as that of lucene. 

Original comment by oss.akk on 3 Apr 2011 at 10:03

Attachments:

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

oss....@gmail.com, did you upload the jar updated for lucene3.1.0 somewhere? it 
would come handy for my right now

regards

Original comment by jmugur...@gmail.com on 4 Apr 2011 at 3:01

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

lukeall-3.1.0.jar attached herewith that works for now. 

Original comment by oss.akk on 6 Apr 2011 at 6:57

Attachments:

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

much appreciated!!!

Original comment by jmugur...@gmail.com on 6 Apr 2011 at 10:11

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

Okay.Thanks!

Original comment by gaole...@gmail.com on 12 Apr 2011 at 2:12

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

works good for me, why is is still not available from the Luke main page?

Original comment by arsic.sa...@gmail.com on 21 Apr 2011 at 12:06

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

Thank you for the patch - this has been applied in rev. 52 with minor 
modifications. This code now is available under branches/branch-3x, and Luke 
releases for Lucene 3x will be prepared from this branch.

Original comment by sig...@gmail.com on 27 Apr 2011 at 9:57

  • Changed state: Fixed

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

Tried out with an 3.1 index once again and looks good. 

It would be good to have a first cut public release soon. Thanks for committing 
the patch. 

Original comment by oss.akk on 29 Apr 2011 at 5:10

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant