Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Feature Request] Traefik integration #102

Closed
Seishirou101 opened this issue Oct 7, 2021 · 4 comments · Fixed by #112 or #123
Closed

[Feature Request] Traefik integration #102

Seishirou101 opened this issue Oct 7, 2021 · 4 comments · Fixed by #112 or #123
Labels
🐳 Docker Issue related to docker image 🔨 Feature New feature or request

Comments

@Seishirou101
Copy link

Is there a way to set it in a way automate with traefik host providers when setting up urls?

@K4CZP3R
Copy link

K4CZP3R commented Oct 8, 2021

Nope, but you can play with docker labels.

@Seishirou101
Copy link
Author

Yes, but I wanted something that would be automatic like this that would always add a new link when I add something new through traefik. Which is why its a feature request!

@pawelmalak pawelmalak added 🐳 Docker Issue related to docker image 🔨 Feature New feature or request labels Oct 22, 2021
@pawelmalak pawelmalak linked a pull request Oct 22, 2021 that will close this issue
@burntcookie90
Copy link

This doesn't seem to be picking my traefik labels up correctly. Here is an example

    labels:
      traefik.enable: true
      traefik.http.routers.app.entrypoints: websecure
      traefik.http.routers.app.middlewares: authelia@docker
      traefik.http.routers.app.rule: Host(`app.domain.me`)
      traefik.http.routers.app.tls.certresolver: letsencrypttls

@Seishirou101
Copy link
Author

Yes, I also can't get to have flame pick up my labels. Is there anything we need to do to enable it?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
🐳 Docker Issue related to docker image 🔨 Feature New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants