Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

allow persistent 1.1 & future persistents #9

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 31, 2012
Merged

allow persistent 1.1 & future persistents #9

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 31, 2012

Conversation

gregwebs
Copy link

No description provided.

@pbrisbin
Copy link
Owner

Isn't it dangerous to have no upper limit?

@pbrisbin
Copy link
Owner

Eh, I guess all we rely on is the PersistField type class, and I don't see that as likely to change in a breaking way.

pbrisbin added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 31, 2012
@pbrisbin
Merge pull request #9 from gregwebs/master
0d588aa 
allow persistent 1.1 & future persistents
@pbrisbin pbrisbin merged commit 0d588aa into pbrisbin:master Dec 31, 2012
@gregwebs
Copy link
Author

yep, exactly. We can always place an upper bound in the rare event that it breaks.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@gregwebs @pbrisbin