Nex is a lexer similar to Lex/Flex that:
-
generates Go code instead of C code
-
integrates with goyacc instead of YACC/Bison
-
supports UTF-8
-
supports nested structural regular expressions.
See ``http://doc.cat-v.org/bell_labs/structural_regexps/se.pdf[Structural Regular Expressions]'' by Rob Pike. I wrote this code to get acquainted with Go and also to explore some of the ideas in the paper. Also, I’ve always been meaning to implement algorithms I learned from a compilers course I took many years ago. Back then, we never needed to code them; merely understanding the theory was enough to pass the exam.
Go has a less general scanner package, but it is especially suited for tokenizing Go code.
The source is in a Git repository:
$ git clone git://github.com/blynn/nex.git
Mercurial users might want to use the hg-git plugin:
$ sudo apt-get install mercurial-git $ hg clone git://github.com/blynn/nex.git
One simple example in the Flex manual is a scanner that counts characters and lines. The program is similar in Nex:
/\n/{ nLines++; nChars++ }
/./{ nChars++ }
//
package main
import ("fmt";"os")
func main() {
var nLines, nChars int
NN_FUN(NewLexer(os.Stdin))
fmt.Printf("%d %d\n", nLines, nChars)
}
The syntax (for now!) resembles Awk more than Flex:
each regex must be delimited. An empty regex terminates the rules section
and signifies the presence of user code, which is printed on standard output
with NN_FUN replaced by the generated scanner.
Name the above file lc.nex. Then running:
$ nex -s < lc.nex
prints Go source to the described scanner. The nng script automates the
compilation and execution of a generated scanner:
$ nng lc.nex < /usr/share/dict/words
generates the Go code in a temporary directory, then compiles and runs it.
The NN_FUN macro is primitive, but I was unable to think of another way to
achieve an Awk-esque feel. Purists unable to tolerate text substitution will
need more code:
/\n/{ lval.l++; lval.c++ }
/./{ lval.c++ }
//
package main
import ("fmt";"os")
type yySymType struct { l, c int }
func main() {
v := new(yySymType)
NewLexer(os.Stdin).Lex(v)
fmt.Printf("%d %d\n", v.l, v.c)
}
and must run nex without the -s option.
We could avoid defining a struct by using globals instead, but even then we need a throwaway definition of yySymType.
The generated code already imports packages such as os, explaining why we
can use os.Stdin without an import statement.
The Flex manual also exhibits a ``http://flex.sourceforge.net/manual/Simple-Examples.html[scanner for a toy Pascal-like language]'', though last I checked, its comment regex was a little buggy. Here is a modified Nex version, without string-to-number conversions:
/[0-9]+/ { println("An integer:", txt()) }
/[0-9]+\.[0-9]*/ { println("A float:", txt()) }
/if|then|begin|end|procedure|function/
{ println( "A keyword:", txt()) }
/[a-z][a-z0-9]*/ { println("An identifier:", txt()) }
/\+|-|\*|\// { println("An operator:", txt()) }
/[ \t\n]+/ { /* eat up whitespace */ }
/./ { println("Unrecognized character:", txt()) }
/{[^\{\}\n]*}/ { /* eat up one-line comments */ }
//
package main
func main() {
lex := NewLexer(os.Stdin)
txt := func() string { return lex.Text() }
NN_FUN(lex)
}
Enough simple examples! Let us see what nesting can do.
In ``Structural Regular Expressions'', Pike imagines a newline-agnostic Awk that operates on matched text, rather than on the whole line containing a match, and writes code converting an input array of characters into descriptions of rectangles. For example, given an input such as:
####### ######### #### ##### #### #### # #### ##### #### ### ######## ##### #### ######### #### # # #### ## # ### ## ### # ### ### ## ## # # #### # # ## # ##
we wish to produce something like:
rect 5 12 1 2 rect 4 13 2 3 rect 3 7 3 4 rect 9 14 3 4 ... rect 10 12 16 17
With Nex, we don’t have to imagine: such programs are real. Below are practical Nex programs that strongly resemble their theoretical counterparts. The one-character-at-a-time variant:
/ /{ x++ }
/#/{ println("rect", x, x+1, y, y+1); x++ }
/\n/{ x=1; y++ }
//
package main
func main() {
x := 1
y := 1
NN_FUN(NewLexer(os.Stdin))
}
The one-run-at-a-time variant:
/ +/{ x+=len(txt()) }
/#+/{ println("rect", x, x+len(txt()), y, y+1); x+=len(txt()) }
/\n/{ x=1; y++ }
//
package main
func main() {
x := 1
y := 1
lex := NewLexer(os.Stdin)
txt := func() string { return lex.Text() }
NN_FUN(lex)
}
The programs are more verbose than Awk because Go is the backend.
Pike demonstrates how nesting structural expressions leads to a few simple text editor commands to print all lines containing "rob" but not "robot". Though Nex fails to separate looping from matching, a corresponding program is bearable:
/[^\n]*\n/ < { isrobot = false; isrob = false }
/robot/ { isrobot = true }
/rob/ { isrob = true }
> { if isrob && !isrobot { fmt.print(lex.Text()) } }
//
package main
import "fmt"
func main() {
var isrobot, isrob bool
lex := NewLexer(os.Stdin)
NN_FUN(lex)
}
The "<" and ">" delimit nested expressions, and work as follows. On reading a line, we find it matches the first regex, so we execute the code immediately following the opening "<".
Then it’s as if we run Nex again, except we focus only on the patterns and actions up to the closing ">", with the matched line as the entire input. Thus we look for occurrences of "rob" and "robot" in just the matched line and set flags accordingly.
After the line ends, we execute the code following the closing ">" and return to our original state, scanning for more lines.
We can simultaneously count lines, words, and characters with Nex thanks to nesting:
/[^\n]*\n/ < {}
/[^ \t\r\n]*/ < {}
/./ { nChars++ }
> { nWords++ }
/./ { nChars++ }
> { nLines++ }
//
package main
import "fmt"
func main() {
var nLines, nWords, nChars int
NN_FUN(NewLexer(os.Stdin))
fmt.Printf("%d %d %d\n", nLines, nWords, nChars)
}
The first regex matches entire lines: each line is passed to the first level of nested regexes. Within this level, the first regex matches words in the line: each word is passed to the second level of nested regexes. Within the second level, a regex causes every character of the word to be counted.
Lastly, we also count whitespace characters, a task performed by the second regex of the first level of nested regexes. We could remove this statement to count only non-whitespace characters.
The following Nex program converts Eastern Arabic numerals to the digits used in the Western world, and also Chinese phrases for numbers (the analog of something like "one-hundred and fifty-three") into digits.
/[零一二三四五六七八九十百千]+/ { fmt.Print(zhToInt(txt())) }
/[٠-٩]/ {
// The above character class might show up right-to-left in a browser.
// The equivalent of 0 should be on the left, and the equivalent of 9 should
// be on the right.
//
// The Eastern Arabic numerals are ٠١٢٣٤٥٦٧٨٩.
fmt.Print([]int(txt())[0] - int('٠'))
}
//
package main
import "fmt"
func zhToInt(s string) int {
n := 0
prev := 0
f := func(m int) {
if 0 == prev { prev = 1 }
n += m * prev
prev = 0
}
for _, c := range s {
for m, v := range []int("一二三四五六七八九") {
if v == c {
prev = m+1
goto continue2
}
}
switch c {
case '零':
case '十': f(10)
case '百': f(100)
case '千': f(1000)
}
continue2:
}
n += prev
return n
}
func main() {
lex := NewLexer(os.Stdin)
txt := func() string { return lex.Text() }
NN_FUN(lex)
}
The parser generated by goyacc exports so little that it’s easiest to keep the lexer and the parser in the same package.
Here’s a goyacc file based on the reverse-Polish-notation calculator example from the Bison manual:
%{
package main
import "fmt"
%}
%union { n int }
%token NUM
%%
input: /* empty */
| input line
;
line: '\n'
| exp '\n' { fmt.Println($1.n); }
;
exp: NUM { $$.n = $1.n; }
| exp exp '+' { $$.n = $1.n + $2.n; }
| exp exp '-' { $$.n = $1.n - $2.n; }
| exp exp '*' { $$.n = $1.n * $2.n; }
| exp exp '/' { $$.n = $1.n / $2.n; }
/* Unary minus */
| exp 'n' { $$.n = -$1.n; }
;
%%
We must import fmt even if we don’t use it, since code generated by goyacc
needs it. Also, the %union is mandatory; it generates yySymType.
Call the above rp.y. Then a suitable lexer, say rp.nex, might be:
/[ \t]/ { /* Skip blanks and tabs. */ }
/[0-9]*/ { lval.n,_ = strconv.Atoi(yylex.Text()); return NUM }
/./ { return int(yylex.Text()[0]) }
//
package main
import "strconv"
func main() {
yyParse(NewLexer(os.Stdin))
}
Assuming you’re using 6g and friends, compile the two with:
$ nex rp.nex && goyacc rp.y && 6g rp.nn.go y.go && 6l rp.nn.6
For brevity, we work in the main package. In a larger project we might want
to write a package that exports a function wrapped around yyParse(). This is
fine, provided the parser and the lexer are both in the same package.
Alternatively, we could use goyacc’s -p option to change the prefix from yy
to one that begins with an uppercase letter.