Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Filter by Date? #53

Open
GoogleCodeExporter opened this issue Mar 2, 2016 · 4 comments
Open

Filter by Date? #53

GoogleCodeExporter opened this issue Mar 2, 2016 · 4 comments

Comments

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link

Perhaps this is possible with some sort of "Advanced Search" but I'm not smart 
enough to know how 
to do it.  I would like to be able to limit the tasks in my milkthecow widget 
to those within the next 
week (or month) as well as those with no date.  Right now, I get a dump of all 
my tasks, even if one 
is only due in a few months.  Sorry if this functionality is already built in.

Original issue reported on code.google.com by k.akgun...@shaw.ca on 17 May 2010 at 2:32

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

http://www.rememberthemilk.com/help/answers/search/advanced.rtm

Try "dueBefore" or "dueWithin" for now. See if you can get that to work.

Original comment by hong.rich on 17 May 2010 at 2:39

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

Thanks for the link.  I was able to achieve my desired behaviour with:

status:incomplete AND (dueWithin:"1 week of today" OR due:never)

Original comment by k.akgun...@shaw.ca on 17 May 2010 at 2:43

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

If I enter that advanced search string mentioned above and click "Done" I get 
the tasks that I want.  However, if I 
click the "i" icon to go back to the settings and then click done, the advanced 
search string gets overwritten.  Is 
there any way to prevent it from "re-setting" when a user returns to the 
settings dialogue?

Original comment by k.akgun...@shaw.ca on 17 May 2010 at 4:46

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

Yeah, that was a bug in 0.6.2
It has since been fixed in the repository, and will be included in the next 
release.

Original comment by hong.rich on 17 May 2010 at 5:29

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant