T13915 coding standard

[niden]

Hello!

• Type: code quality
• Link to issue: Coding Standard #13915

In raising this pull request, I confirm the following:

• I have read and understood the Contributing Guidelines
• I have checked that another pull request for this purpose does not exist
• I wrote some tests for this PR
• I updated the CHANGELOG

Applying the new coding standard for Phalcon. Certain files have been left untouched intentionally - they will be replaced./refactored later on

Thanks

[niden]

cc @sergeyklay

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #13918 into 4.0.x will decrease coverage by 0.23%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##            4.0.x   #13918      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   67.79%   67.55%   -0.24%     
==========================================
  Files         468      468              
  Lines       93291    94027     +736     
==========================================
+ Hits        63246    63523     +277     
- Misses      30045    30504     +459

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
ext/phalcon/exception.zep.c	21.05% <0%> (-78.95%)	⬇️
ext/phalcon/security.zep.c	83.77% <0%> (-6.87%)	⬇️
ext/phalcon/di/injectable.zep.c	65.04% <0%> (-4.96%)	⬇️
ext/phalcon/session/bag.zep.c	82.91% <0%> (-4.76%)	⬇️
ext/phalcon/mvc/model/transaction/manager.zep.c	59.41% <0%> (-2.82%)	⬇️
ext/phalcon/url.zep.c	82.7% <0%> (-2.22%)	⬇️
ext/phalcon/cli/console.zep.c	89.97% <0%> (-2.21%)	⬇️
ext/phalcon/http/cookie.zep.c	50.62% <0%> (-1.77%)	⬇️
ext/phalcon/mvc/application.zep.c	67.13% <0%> (-1.37%)	⬇️
ext/phalcon/mvc/view/simple.zep.c	49.26% <0%> (-1.34%)	⬇️
... and 100 more

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 5af4ca4...fb7b6cb. Read the comment docs.

[SidRoberts]

Is there a reason why Phalcon\Application, Phalcon\Cache* didn't get renamed?

[sergeyklay]

I have no idea :) Well, PRs are always welcome!

[niden]

@SidRoberts Application it was most likely a mishap.

Cache is going to be rewritten for PSR-16 so no point in renaming it.

[SidRoberts]

Fixed in #13920