You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
A handful of the planets include the string standard in the value for the gravity field while the remainder use a numeric value, (excluding the unknown values). I've included a table below listing the planets and their gravity values. Is this intentional? Looking at the documentation, there's no mention of any other unit of measurement besides standard gravity. I'd like to propose the values be updated to remove the unit of measurement, (would help with #15).
Additionally, a defined format for the data presented by the gravity field would be beneficial when parsing considering the existing variation in values, (looking specifically at Bespin). I'd like to propose the following ...
number number (discriminator) number1 (discriminator1), number2 (discriminator2), numberN (discriminatorN)
number is the standard gravity.
discriminator is an optional, character restricted string surrounded by parenthesis used to add context to the value, (refer to row for Bespin in table below).
A handful of the planets include the string standard in the value for the
gravity
field while the remainder use a numeric value, (excluding the unknown values). I've included a table below listing the planets and theirgravity
values. Is this intentional? Looking at the documentation, there's no mention of any other unit of measurement besides standard gravity. I'd like to propose the values be updated to remove the unit of measurement, (would help with #15).Additionally, a defined format for the data presented by the
gravity
field would be beneficial when parsing considering the existing variation in values, (looking specifically at Bespin). I'd like to propose the following ...Thoughts?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: