Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use Docker health check to decrease wait for container #154

Merged

Conversation

philippgille
Copy link
Owner

After @glimchb added many Docker health checks in #142, we can now make use of it for decreasing the wait time for a container to be running.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Dec 3, 2023

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (9ff6a17) 65.26% compared to head (dacdddf) 65.26%.

❗ Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #154   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   65.26%   65.26%           
=======================================
  Files          25       25           
  Lines        2096     2096           
=======================================
  Hits         1368     1368           
  Misses        601      601           
  Partials      127      127           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@philippgille philippgille force-pushed the use-health-check-to-decrease-wait-for-container branch from d09f507 to dacdddf Compare December 3, 2023 22:13
@philippgille philippgille merged commit c753026 into master Dec 5, 2023
8 checks passed
@philippgille philippgille deleted the use-health-check-to-decrease-wait-for-container branch January 7, 2024 15:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants