NAs in Allophones

[bambooforest]

Not sure if this is an issue @drammock but I'm in the middle of the aspiration cleaning so wanted to file a quick issue as not to forget what I came across (Source, LanguageCode, Phoneme, Allophone):

ra awa cçʰ NA
ra ben cçʰ NA
ra bft cçʰ NA
ra bkk cçʰ NA
ra bns cçʰ NA
ra cdn cçʰ NA
gm xuu bʰ bʰ
ph ahk cçʰ cçʰ
spa aka cçʰ cçʰ

[drammock]

That is a feature, not a bug. NA means "this resource had no info about allophones at all", where as an empty string means "this resource listed allophones for some phonemes, but this particular phoneme didn't have an entry". If you want to discuss revising this convention, feel free to re-open and convince me :)

[bambooforest]

reopening because this is smart and it should be noted in the conventions, which i will do.

[drammock]

ok, just make sure to re-close once that's done. Also, can we change the
conventions document from PDF to plain text or (better yet) markdown?

On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 3:36 PM, Steven Moran notifications@github.com
wrote:

reopening because this is smart and it should be noted in the conventions,
which i will do.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#80 (comment).

[drammock]

the information about NA in allophone column is now recorded on the wiki, so I'm closing this issue.