New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
executor/aggfuncs: migrate test-infra to testify for func_json_arrayagg_test.go, func_first_row_test.go, func_avg_test.go, and func_bitfuncs_test.go #28979
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
8 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
7f0fe94
executor/aggfuncs: migrate test-infra to testify for func_json_arraya…
budougumi0617 ff4a93e
executor/aggfuncs: migrate test-infra to testify for func_first_row_t…
budougumi0617 935e1ef
executor/aggfuncs: migrate test-infra to testify for func_avg_test.go…
budougumi0617 23f6e44
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/master' into fix-issue-28510
budougumi0617 e696ad0
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/master' into fix-issue-28510
budougumi0617 97b6983
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/master' into fix-issue-28510
budougumi0617 7bea66f
Merge branch 'master' into fix-issue-28510
mmyj 5a656a1
Merge branch 'master' into fix-issue-28510
ti-chi-bot File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I will remove
func (s *testSuite) testAggMemFunc(c *C, p aggMemTest)
fromagg_func_test.go
and refactorfunc_count_test.go
in my next PR, because when this PR is merged, onlyfunc_count_test.go
will call the method. However, I did not include it in this change because the change infunc_count_test.go
is a bit larger :)