Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ddl: build sessPool even if RunWorker == false (#33677) #33692

Closed

Conversation

ti-srebot
Copy link
Contributor

@ti-srebot ti-srebot commented Apr 2, 2022

cherry-pick #33677 to release-4.0
You can switch your code base to this Pull Request by using git-extras:

# In tidb repo:
git pr https://github.com/pingcap/tidb/pull/33692

After apply modifications, you can push your change to this PR via:

git push git@github.com:ti-srebot/tidb.git pr/33692:release-4.0-88cd76535d57

Signed-off-by: wjhuang2016 huangwenjun1997@gmail.com

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: close #33676

Problem Summary:
struct ddl doesn't have sessPool if RunWorker == false

What is changed and how it works?

Move the code to make sure build sessPool even if RunWorker == false

Check List

Tests

  • Unit test
  • Integration test
    pass integration-ddl-test
  • Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
  • No code

Side effects

  • Performance regression: Consumes more CPU
  • Performance regression: Consumes more Memory
  • Breaking backward compatibility

Documentation

  • Affects user behaviors
  • Contains syntax changes
  • Contains variable changes
  • Contains experimental features
  • Changes MySQL compatibility

Release note

None

Signed-off-by: ti-srebot <ti-srebot@pingcap.com>
@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

ti-chi-bot commented Apr 2, 2022

[REVIEW NOTIFICATION]

This pull request has been approved by:

  • ngaut

To complete the pull request process, please ask the reviewers in the list to review by filling /cc @reviewer in the comment.
After your PR has acquired the required number of LGTMs, you can assign this pull request to the committer in the list by filling /assign @committer in the comment to help you merge this pull request.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Reviewer can indicate their review by submitting an approval review.
Reviewer can cancel approval by submitting a request changes review.

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

@ti-srebot: This cherry pick PR is for a release branch and has not yet been approved by release team.
Adding the do-not-merge/cherry-pick-not-approved label.

To merge this cherry pick, it must first be approved by the collaborators.

AFTER it has been approved by collaborators, please ping the release team in a comment to request a cherry pick review.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@ti-srebot
Copy link
Contributor Author

/run-all-tests

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added do-not-merge/cherry-pick-not-approved release-note-none do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed Indicates that a PR should not merge because it's missing one of the release note labels. and removed do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed Indicates that a PR should not merge because it's missing one of the release note labels. labels Apr 2, 2022
@ti-srebot ti-srebot added size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. type/4.0-cherry-pick labels Apr 2, 2022
@ti-srebot
Copy link
Contributor Author

@wjhuang2016 you're already a collaborator in bot's repo.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the status/LGT1 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 1. label Apr 4, 2022
@xhebox
Copy link
Contributor

xhebox commented Aug 30, 2022

close for DMR version

@xhebox xhebox closed this Aug 30, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
do-not-merge/cherry-pick-not-approved release-note-none size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. status/LGT1 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 1. type/4.0-cherry-pick
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants