Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

aries or fape for non-hierarchical planning? #36

Closed
d-vyd opened this issue Mar 25, 2022 · 2 comments
Closed

aries or fape for non-hierarchical planning? #36

d-vyd opened this issue Mar 25, 2022 · 2 comments

Comments

@d-vyd
Copy link

d-vyd commented Mar 25, 2022

Hi folks. I'm trying to compare temporal planners (tdf, optic, etc). Should I include aries or fape for non-hierarchical planning? It looks like aries is the current project, correct? I started with fape after reading some of Arthur's publications. Right now I'm unable to make performance comparisons because I seem to be calling fape incorrectly. No matter what I do, I get an exception on Windows 11 64bit machine. EDIT: I think the problem is my java environment. I'll change that.

@arbimo
Copy link
Member

arbimo commented Apr 13, 2022

Aries currently supports non-temporal planning in the sense that it can translate a flat problem into its own representation and use its internal constraint solver to look for a solution.
However, there has been no effort in making the solving efficient for flat-problems (notably with branching heuristics and symmetry breaking) and as a result you will not get state-of-the-art performance for such problems. The current focus is on hierarchical planning for which much better results can be expected. We do have plan to improve the story for flat planning but I cannot give a timeline at the moment.

@d-vyd
Copy link
Author

d-vyd commented Apr 14, 2022

Got it. Thank you for writing!

@d-vyd d-vyd closed this as completed Apr 14, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants