Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

PLIP 13283: merge some plone.app.* packages into the Products.CMFPlone distribution #28

Closed
wants to merge 2,420 commits into from

Conversation

witsch
Copy link
Member

@witsch witsch commented Oct 19, 2012

Preliminary pull request for PLIP 13283. This is intended to make it easier to follow the PLIP's changes and discuss them.

esteele and others added 30 commits January 26, 2012 21:21
other action keys.  p.a.toolbar, for example, wants to make use of
link_target.
The target can be configured on a per-action basis.  Useful for
controlling overlays such as with plone.app.toolbar.
Move .row and .cell styles to Sunburst main_template
… ILocalPortletAssignmentManager is contained within something which does not implement ILocalPortletAssignmentManager. e.g. a Dexterity type contained within an Archetypes type. Currently @@manage-portlets breaks on Dexterity items contained within Archetypes items by way of this flaw.
This may affect plone.app.form (IOW, formlib) forms whose subscribers
call plone.locking.TTWLockable.lock().
Fix inherited local portlets where dexterity content is contained by non-dexterity content
…so added tests to check that you're not able to add portlets into someone else's dashboard, and that the Member role is not able to add portlets anywhere else, unless it gets the 'Manage portlets' permission
Further changes for bug #11174
garbas and others added 17 commits October 9, 2012 13:51
Change to unify the site setup html structure
=============================================
- Check for structure:

  #portal-column-content
    #content
      .setup-link
      .documentFirstHeading
      .documentDescription
      #content-core

- Check for body template- class

Related changes
---------------
Templates have also changed in:
  plone.app.contentrules
  plone.app.controlpanel
  plone.app.discussion
  plone.app.registry
  plone.app.users
  Products.CMFPlone

Styles have been updated in plonetheme.sunburst
Change to unify the site setup html structure
=============================================
- Check for structure:

  #portal-column-content
    #content
      .setup-link
      .documentFirstHeading
      .documentDescription
      #content-core

- Check for body template- class

Related changes
---------------
Templates have also changed in:
  plone.app.contentrules
  plone.app.controlpanel
  plone.app.discussion
  plone.app.registry
  plone.app.users
  Products.CMFPlone

Styles have been updated in plonetheme.sunburst
add buildout to run tests
@witsch
Copy link
Member Author

witsch commented Oct 19, 2012

hmm, maybe the history of the merged packages (so far two) doesn't make this a very good place to get an overview… :)

nevertheless if you're interested in the actual changes, search the commits for "into Products.CMFPlone"…

@davisagli davisagli mentioned this pull request Feb 25, 2014
90 tasks
@jensens
Copy link
Sponsor Member

jensens commented Apr 8, 2014

Phew, i fear this one is completely outdated and impossible to merge/fix. Folks, code's getting rotten if it's not eaten early. Pull requests are not a deep freezer.

@witsch
Copy link
Member Author

witsch commented Apr 8, 2014

@jensens, yes, of course it's outdated by now. the branch and pull request were merely an experiment with regard to how to best go about merging those packages. not nearly all packages discussed in the PLIP have been merged here, but i suppose i should have put a note about this and the the branch needs to be "restarted" eventually...

@jensens
Copy link
Sponsor Member

jensens commented Apr 8, 2014

@witsch I thought so. I'am just in cleanup mood and looked around the branches ;) Imo we should close this one and start fresh one (or several - one for each step) to have a clean and manageable record.

@witsch
Copy link
Member Author

witsch commented Apr 8, 2014

yes, i agree — this should probably be closed. thanks to your comment @davisagli and i discussed the timing of this again, and we think it's best to start (over) on this again when most things have been merged for plone 5, but before any final releases have been made...

@witsch witsch closed this Apr 8, 2014
@jensens jensens deleted the dependency-merges branch December 2, 2014 21:38
jensens pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 12, 2021
Include a note about Plone version in the README
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.