Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

python killed #36

Closed
Tracked by #3
sophia-xll opened this issue Aug 14, 2017 · 4 comments
Closed
Tracked by #3

python killed #36

sophia-xll opened this issue Aug 14, 2017 · 4 comments

Comments

@sophia-xll
Copy link

I use 256G memory and 21T free disk space to run 9G a.gdb. After 9 hours running ,It occurs "killed".

How could this happen?What can i do to fix this? Thanks for any help.

@jvelazquez90
Copy link

Hello Sophia, could you solve the problem of python killed? I have a file of streets of Argentina that weighs more than 1 GB in format shape
  and when trying to convert it to osm I get that message. Transform shape to osm works for me with smaller extracts but I would need
I can do it by country.

@toton6868
Copy link

I have a similar problem. I have a 1.7 GB Road network. Using a 16GB Ram and 80GB storage (AWS m4.xLarge) to convert from shapefile to osm. Successfully done in MacBook Pro but when trying to automate in server it got killed. @pnorman can you look after this?

@Firefishy
Copy link

Likely best workaround is to split the shapefile with a tool like ogr2ogr. Example here: https://gis.stackexchange.com/questions/176622/split-shp-file-using-ogr2ogr

@roelderickx
Copy link
Collaborator

I agree with @Firefishy regarding the issues described by @jvelazquez90 and @toton6868. In both cases it sounds as if memory runs out and not enough swapspace is available to continue.
However, I think @sophia-xll was affected by #38 which is fixed in the latest version. Ogr2osm shouldn't run for 9 hours, even on slow hardware using swapspace.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants