Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Terminal in tiling mode has border/gap when none is set #213

Closed
TheChiefMeat opened this issue Apr 21, 2020 · 2 comments
Closed

Terminal in tiling mode has border/gap when none is set #213

TheChiefMeat opened this issue Apr 21, 2020 · 2 comments

Comments

@TheChiefMeat
Copy link

Distribution

NAME="Pop!_OS"
VERSION="20.04"
ID=pop
ID_LIKE="ubuntu debian"
PRETTY_NAME="Pop!_OS 20.04"
VERSION_ID="20.04"
HOME_URL="https://system76.com/pop"
SUPPORT_URL="http://support.system76.com"
BUG_REPORT_URL="https://github.com/pop-os/pop/issues"
PRIVACY_POLICY_URL="https://system76.com/privacy"
VERSION_CODENAME=focal
UBUNTU_CODENAME=focal
LOGO=distributor-logo-pop-os

Issue/Bug Description:
The terminal window has a border/gap, despite the tiling gap size being set to 0.

Steps to reproduce (if you know):
Turn on tiling mode, open a window plus a terminal window. Set Gaps to 0.

Expected behavior:
When the terminal is open in tiling mode and gap is set to 0, there should be no gap.

Edit

Added below image for reference:

2020-03-29_17-42

@TheChiefMeat TheChiefMeat changed the title Terminal in tiling mode has border when none is set Terminal in tiling mode has border/gap when none is set Apr 21, 2020
@leviport leviport transferred this issue from pop-os/iso Apr 21, 2020
@mmstick
Copy link
Member

mmstick commented Apr 21, 2020

The gap is created by GNOME Terminal itself, because it resizes itself to certain increments.

@mmstick mmstick closed this as completed Apr 21, 2020
@TheChiefMeat
Copy link
Author

TheChiefMeat commented Apr 21, 2020

@mmstick Is there any way in PopOS to get rid of that gap?

Edit: Nevermind, appears to be a feature of that terminal, switching to Konsole instead.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants