Add Canis familiaris to species catalog.

[grahamgower]

TODO: species specific tests and rtd stuff. Anything else missing?

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #375 into master will increase coverage by <.01%.
The diff coverage is 100%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #375      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   99.48%   99.49%   +<.01%     
==========================================
  Files          14       15       +1     
  Lines        1164     1179      +15     
  Branches      120      121       +1     
==========================================
+ Hits         1158     1173      +15     
  Misses          2        2              
  Partials        4        4

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
stdpopsim/catalog/canis_familiaris.py	100% <100%> (ø)

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update fc9cc66...ca39738. Read the comment docs.

[andrewkern]

looks good. just missing the RTD stuff and tests, yeah

[andrewkern]

was the RTD thing with the citations to blame here for the ci error?

[grahamgower]

Yep. And as far as I can tell, the unit tests that are missing from this PR would only be like those I'm complaining about in #376.

[andrewkern]

just looked at that issue. for now lets stick to including too many unit tests i think and if you agree we can get this one merged

[grahamgower]

Ok, I added the unit test file. In the spirit of providing solutions, and not just criticism, I put in an end-to-end test (i.e. test that this runs: stdpopsim CanFam -c chr38 -l 0.001 --seed 1234 -q 10).

[jeromekelleher]

This is excellent, thanks @grahamgower! It would be nice to add tests for pop size as I discussed in #376, but otherwise LGTM.

[jeromekelleher]

I'm happy to merge here. I'll let @andrewkern push the button in case there's anything he spots.

[andrewkern]

looks really good. i like the end-to-end test especially @grahamgower. this might be a good standard to adopt for each species.