Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Parallel participant support for scaled-consistent mappings #962

Draft
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

oguzziya
Copy link
Contributor

Main changes of this PR

In #906 scaled-consistent mapping is introduced only for serial participants. This PR expands it for parallel participants too. There are a few things to accomplish first.

Motivation and additional information

Currently, scaled-consistent mapping is only supported for serial participants.

Author's checklist

  • Add ownership information for Edge and Triangle
  • Introduce more aggressive repartioning to consider connectivity information
  • I added a changelog file with this PR number in docs/changelog/ if there are noteworthy changes.
  • I ran tools/formatting/check-format and everything is formatted correctly.
  • I sticked to C++14 features.
  • I sticked to CMake version 3.10.
  • I squashed / am about to squash all commits that should be seen as one.

Reviewers' checklist

  • Does the changelog entry make sense? Is it formatted correctly?
  • Do you understand the code changes?
  • (more questions/tasks)

@oguzziya oguzziya self-assigned this Feb 10, 2021
@oguzziya oguzziya marked this pull request as draft February 10, 2021 10:11
@oguzziya oguzziya added the enhancement A new feature, a new functionality of preCICE (from user perspective) label Feb 10, 2021
@oguzziya oguzziya added this to the Version 2.3.0 milestone Feb 10, 2021
@precice-bot
Copy link

This pull request has been mentioned on preCICE Forum on Discourse. There might be relevant details there:

https://precice.discourse.group/t/highlights-of-the-new-precice-release-v2-3/750/1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement A new feature, a new functionality of preCICE (from user perspective)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants