Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ROCm 2.7 - PRP performance drop #60

Closed
valeriob01 opened this issue Aug 14, 2019 · 3 comments
Closed

ROCm 2.7 - PRP performance drop #60

valeriob01 opened this issue Aug 14, 2019 · 3 comments

Comments

@valeriob01
Copy link
Contributor

valeriob01 commented Aug 14, 2019

warning: do not update to ROCm 2.7 - performance is poor (again I would say), basically radeon VII timing went from 908 to 990 us/sq.

@valeriob01 valeriob01 reopened this Aug 16, 2019
@valeriob01 valeriob01 changed the title ROCm 2.7 with RX5700: Device not found ROCm 2.7 - PRP performance drop Aug 16, 2019
@valeriob01
Copy link
Contributor Author

Here I am puzzled by the fact that the performance drop is present with an upgrade to version 2.7, but absent with a new installation.

@preda
Copy link
Owner

preda commented Sep 6, 2019

Indeed the difference between fresh install/upgrade is very puzzling. Let me know if you find more about that. In the meantime, ROCm is doing a bad job on the performance front IMO, they must be busy with something else. What I do is: I've extracted the opencl library from an old version of ROCm that was working ok (2.2?) and keep using that with LD_LIBRARY_PATH, i.e. using the OpenCL compiler from an old ROCm version.

@preda preda closed this as completed Sep 6, 2019
@valeriob01
Copy link
Contributor Author

Yes, ROCm is not improving performance, my opinion is that they work on new features now.
I have extracted version 2.2 and modified LD_LIBRARY_PATH. Recovered good speed.
Running the rocm.sh script gives an empty LD_LIBRARY_PATH (I think it loads from a default location then), issuing the command on the prompt works, thus I think to put the export line inside my own script.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants