(Re)move formatoptions/comments to ftplugin #144
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
This does make sense. Just to understand better: is it just a conceptual difference (which I agree with), or is there also a behaviour change between ftplugin and syntax? |
Yes, because e.g. with no syntax handling, the syntax file would not get parsed. |
|
Now those are moved to indent/markdown.vim. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Do not set formatoptions/comments in syntax file!
Remove them and source it via
markdownplugin via ftplugin.This will now trigger the buggy indenting for everyone (#126), which should get fixed, before merging this.