Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

SAK value problem #271

Closed
GoogleCodeExporter opened this issue Mar 14, 2015 · 1 comment
Closed

SAK value problem #271

GoogleCodeExporter opened this issue Mar 14, 2015 · 1 comment

Comments

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link

Hi, everybody.I have a access control card.
After I duplicate data to new card at Windows 7(x64) system,it's SAK = 88.
Why original card SAK =08 ??


Original card information as follows:

nfc-list uses libnfc 1.5.1
Connected to NFC device: ACS ACR122 0 / ACR122U214 - PN532 v1.6 (0x07)
1 ISO14443A passive target(s) found:
    ATQA (SENS_RES): 00  04  
       UID (NFCID1): 31  72  3a  e3  
      SAK (SEL_RES): 08  

Command:
nfc-mfclassic r a filename
Result:
Open filename,I find SAK =88
00000000h: 31 72 3A E3 9A 88 04 00 C0 8E 1D D3 41 90 33 12
00000010h: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 
00000020h: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 
00000030h: FF FF FF FF FF FF FF 07 80 69 00 00 00 00 00 00   

Command:
nfc-mfclassic R a filename
Result:
Connected to NFC reader: ACS ACR122 0 / ACR122U214 - PN532 v1.6 (0x07)
Found MIFARE Classic card:
    ATQA (SENS_RES): 00  04  
       UID (NFCID1): 31  72  3a  e3  
      SAK (SEL_RES): 08  
Guessing size: seems to be a 1024-byte card
Unlocking card
Sent bits:     50  00  57  cd  
Sent bits:     40 (7 bits)
unlock failure!

But dump by "mfoc" program. I got
00000000h: 31 72 3A E3 9A 88 04 00 C0 8E 1D D3 41 90 33 12
00000010h: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
00000020h: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
00000030h: FF FF FF FF FF FF FF 07 80 69 FF FF FF FF FF FF

Original issue reported on code.google.com by chihfeng...@gmail.com on 4 Mar 2014 at 9:04

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

Memory content and anticollision SAK are not as linked as you think.
libnfc is correct AFAIK.

Original comment by yob...@gmail.com on 4 Mar 2014 at 9:32

  • Changed state: Invalid

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant