Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: remove drand.love from website testing #11

Open
SgtPooki opened this issue Mar 11, 2024 · 6 comments
Open

chore: remove drand.love from website testing #11

SgtPooki opened this issue Mar 11, 2024 · 6 comments

Comments

@SgtPooki
Copy link

SgtPooki commented Mar 11, 2024

drand.love does not have dnsaddr or dnslink TXT record.

see ipfs/helia-http-gateway@84455c1 (#63) && https://ipshipyard.slack.com/archives/C06C9LWQZC3/p1710190166872059 (non public slack link)

related: ipfs/ipfs-companion#1052

drand.love does not load on dweb.link nor ipfs.io because of this:

@lidel
Copy link

lidel commented Mar 11, 2024

Not sure who is DRI these days, but we should ask them to fix dnslink, rather to remove website.
Was it always missing? Maybe it got broken during nucleation migration from PL to standalone accounts.

@SgtPooki
Copy link
Author

SgtPooki commented Mar 11, 2024

I pinged them in the #drand channel on filecoin slack: https://filecoinproject.slack.com/archives/C047Z15JNEA/p1710190774272009

Erick W is running things over there now, so i pinged him. he already responded and said they will look into it

@dennis-tra
Copy link
Contributor

Sure! I'll update the deployment tomorrow 👍

@SgtPooki
Copy link
Author

FYI:

image

@dennis-tra
Copy link
Contributor

What DNS entries is Patrick referring to? If it's the DNSLink TXT record, from the messages it sounds like he re-added the entry? However, dig TXT _dnslink.drand.love doesn't return anything for me 🤔

@SgtPooki
Copy link
Author

Same. I think they removed the x-ipfs-path, im not sure

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants