adding translation editors to YAML metadata

[arojascastro]

I have been reviewing some tutorials and I found out that our metatada information is not very consistent.

tutorial without original reviewers

tutorial without translation editor

tutorial with translation editor

In my opinion, only the last tutorial contains the necessary metadata information.

I am wondering whether is possible to use any validation system for this (Travis?) @mdlincoln @acrymble ?

[arojascastro]

By the way the snippet traducción editado por should be traducción editada por (in femenine).

[acrymble]

Some of the early lessons involving Fred Gibbs didn't have reviewers. That's not inconsistent with what happened. He did the reviewing himself, acting as an editor.

[arojascastro]

Ok, but can we validate the metadata about translations? I just want a list of tutorials that do not contain that info... of course I can check out myself but it is time consuming. If we cant do it automatically please let me know and I will.

[mdlincoln]

We do check metadata @arojascastro (#426) however right now translation_editor is not validated, because only one lesson actually had a translation-editor in it. I'll add that field to the checklist now, and then you'll see all the errors for lessons that are missing it.

[mdlincoln]

You can find the list of lessons with missing translation-editor here: https://travis-ci.org/programminghistorian/jekyll

[arojascastro]

Super! @mdlincoln

[mdlincoln]

Apologies, the specific build listing the missing YAML is here: https://travis-ci.org/programminghistorian/jekyll/builds/281347660

[arojascastro]

@mdlincoln 🔝 💯

[mdlincoln]

@arojascastro Is it possible to add these editors soon? Without having the editor metadata in place, we will keep receiving build errors and it makes other development work difficult.

[arojascastro]

@mdlincoln sorry, I can't work on this until Sunday... you may turn it off? Now I know that basically all lessons need that feld. Maybe @vgayolrs and @mariajoafana can help me?

[arojascastro]

I am sorry @mdlincoln but I must postpone this tak for some more days.

[mdlincoln]

Hi @arojascastro @vgayolrs what is the current status of this ticket?

[arojascastro]

Sorry for the super delay @mdlincoln - this pull request should solve the problem: #666

Please let me know if there is any lesson missing that field yet.

[arojascastro]

Thanks @vgayolrs for approving my request. Can @mdlincoln check that Travis validation is good?