-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[FEATURE] record support for @Builder #2851
Comments
|
just updated to 1.18.20, using IntelliJ indeed. compile seems to work fine now but IDE isn't aware yet. thanks for the suggestion |
7 tasks
Nice! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Describe the feature
Currently the @builder annotation doesn't seem to support java 16 records yet. Records are in my view a good addition that removes a bunch of boilerplate code. however they are sadly limited and overloading a record constructor is a hassle when they get more members.
Describe the target audience
Java 16 developers.
Additional context
records implicitly have an "allargsconstructor" already.
when currently annotating a record with @builder is seems that none of the members are added to the builder class, even tho this might be a bug i consider this request a feature because records are a new feature to java.
public class Test {
}
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: