Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Gain-Correction #107

Open
Stoft1 opened this issue Mar 16, 2015 · 6 comments
Open

Gain-Correction #107

Stoft1 opened this issue Mar 16, 2015 · 6 comments
Milestone

Comments

@Stoft1
Copy link

Stoft1 commented Mar 16, 2015

After some experimentation ( http://publiclab.org/notes/stoft/02-25-2015/plab-spectrometer-gain-correction ) it looks possible that a default gain-correction curve could be included as part of SWB at least as an option. While there are significant limits to the PLab devices from the intensity vs. wavelength calibration, as a true calibration, a first-order approximation seems like a major improvement in the direction of providing users with more meaningful spectral results. As an adjunct to this, it might be helpful to add graphical markers at the wavelength limits -- i.e. ~400nm and ~700nm as beyond these limits the noise takes over as the camera has virtually no relative sensitivity.

@jywarren
Copy link
Member

jywarren commented Apr 1, 2015

Starting to explore pseudocode or stepwise procedure for ths sort of correction here: http://publiclab.org/notes/stoft/03-06-2015/plab-3-gain-correction#c11453

@jywarren
Copy link
Member

jywarren commented Feb 1, 2016

@jywarren jywarren added in progress and removed ready labels Feb 8, 2016
@jywarren
Copy link
Member

This can now be run in v2.1.7; using:

SpectralWorkbench.API.Core.useReference(false, spectrum);
graph.reload_and_refresh();

default is "/references/solux-4700K-stoft.csv" and there's also "/references/solux-4700K-rolloff-stoft.csv"

jywarren added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 18, 2016
@jywarren
Copy link
Member

This is now working basically in v2.1.9 -- however we need a better UI.

@jywarren
Copy link
Member

  1. OK, so I'm thinking -- we could display a list of webcam/lightbulb pairs for correction files, and also link to where you can do this process for an arbitrary pair and submit it to be added to the list.
  2. In terms of vocabulary, is "Gain calibration" the only way to refer to this? I want to be sure that if people are seeking "exposure calibration" it's clear whether or not this is the equivalent.
  3. We also need to display error. We could show an overlay of error, or a screenshotted graph of error, or we could simply name a maximum percentage, or we could do all three at different junctures.

@jywarren
Copy link
Member

jywarren commented Mar 1, 2016

Hi, Dave - sorry, i've been busy. Just wanted to get your input on "gain calibration" as terminology. Would "exposure calibration" be an equivalent term?

@jywarren jywarren modified the milestones: 2.0 launch, 2.2 Nov 17, 2016
@jywarren jywarren removed the ready label May 31, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants