-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 157
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Gain-Correction #107
Comments
Starting to explore pseudocode or stepwise procedure for ths sort of correction here: http://publiclab.org/notes/stoft/03-06-2015/plab-3-gain-correction#c11453 |
Going to use |
This can now be run in v2.1.7; using: SpectralWorkbench.API.Core.useReference(false, spectrum);
graph.reload_and_refresh(); default is "/references/solux-4700K-stoft.csv" and there's also "/references/solux-4700K-rolloff-stoft.csv" |
This is now working basically in v2.1.9 -- however we need a better UI. |
|
Hi, Dave - sorry, i've been busy. Just wanted to get your input on "gain calibration" as terminology. Would "exposure calibration" be an equivalent term? |
After some experimentation ( http://publiclab.org/notes/stoft/02-25-2015/plab-spectrometer-gain-correction ) it looks possible that a default gain-correction curve could be included as part of SWB at least as an option. While there are significant limits to the PLab devices from the intensity vs. wavelength calibration, as a true calibration, a first-order approximation seems like a major improvement in the direction of providing users with more meaningful spectral results. As an adjunct to this, it might be helpful to add graphical markers at the wavelength limits -- i.e. ~400nm and ~700nm as beyond these limits the noise takes over as the camera has virtually no relative sensitivity.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: