We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
The semantic declaration order is not respected in Pumascript. The testcase that must pass is the following one:
foo(2,3); function foo(a, b) { return a + b; }
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Ema can you give me an example of a failing statement that I can use in the puma-editor? I tried the following example and it worked fine I believe:
/** @meta */ function sum(a, b) { return pumaAst( $a + $b); } sum(5, 6);
Sorry, something went wrong.
The problem is if you call some function that was not defined yet. This in JS works fine but in puma not.
If you see the example, you can use it to verify:
`foo(2,3);
function foo(a, b) { return a + b; } `
albertinadx
No branches or pull requests
The semantic declaration order is not respected in Pumascript. The testcase that must pass is the following one:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: