Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature: Undo #2

Open
romanofski opened this issue Jul 18, 2017 · 7 comments
Open

Feature: Undo #2

romanofski opened this issue Jul 18, 2017 · 7 comments

Comments

@romanofski
Copy link
Member

At this point in time this feature is very vague in my understanding. Wishful thinking: I can undo whatever actions I've applied on my mails (except actions like sending ... ).

For example if I have tagged messages wrong, how can I find the wrong tagged mail again?

@romanofski romanofski modified the milestone: Future Feature Aug 24, 2017
@romanofski
Copy link
Member Author

We could probably implement a simple undo feature only regarding tags, which stores a list of tags and the operation in a list. Anything more fancy could be something for the future.

@frasertweedale
Copy link
Member

IMO we should just close this for now. What is the value? What cannot be easily undone / repaired with what we have now? IMO it is unneeded complexity when we have so much else to do.

We can always revisit later but for now I feel that this is just noise.

@romanofski
Copy link
Member Author

The value is, that you tag with a shortcut and you can undo your last tagging option effectively making the tagged/stashed away mail or thread re-appear again. If you've fat-fingered the mail away it may take you a while to figure with what you've tagged the mail and find it.

@frasertweedale
Copy link
Member

Fair enough. Maybe we could/should make a log of (recent) actions? IMO this is all pretty low prio stuff tho.

@romanofski
Copy link
Member Author

Yeah I like the idea and agree for the low priority. Hence no 1.0 milestone on the bug.

@frasertweedale
Copy link
Member

@romanofski is this idea still important enough for you to keep this open in the backlog?

@romanofski
Copy link
Member Author

Yeah I still like it and want it. I'm pretty sure I'd file it again if we close this one here :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants